Days
after the fire family members were still frantically trying to identify the
charred remains of the victims. So many of the deceased were burned beyond
recognition that the only hope the family members had was identifying a small
scrap of clothing or shoe. Some considered themselves lucky to find the broken,
unburned remains of their daughters who chose to leap from the window in order
to avoid the flames. Newspapers in 1911 were filled with stories of these unlucky
women, who were unfortunate enough to work in a society that did not value their
lives enough to protect them.
Both fires were called one of the worst/most
tragic/devastating fires in their area. What makes it the most devastating? Neither
incident was the first fire, leading to death, the area had had. Are they
ranking fires by death toll? Every death should be tragic/devastating/ the
worst. These fires could have been easily avoided. Both factory owners knew the
risks. They had seen firsthand what could have happened, but they made their
avarice more important than human lives.
At the time of the Triangle fires the leading
political party ignored requests to reform the system. Women were not allowed
to vote, and because the garment industry mostly employed women, it was seen as
a women’s issue. What’s Bangladesh’s excuse? One hundred years later and the
world is repeating itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment